By Asit K Biswas, Cecilia Tortajada, The Nation, June 27, 2017
Much has been written about the building of hydropower dams in the upper reaches of the Mekong River and their role in causing droughts in the Mekong delta region in Vietnam.
Many environmental and social activists claim Chinese dams have reduced the water flow in the delta, seriously harming rice cultivation and allowing saltwater to seep into soil.
Closer scrutiny of the facts reveals that drought dealt a serious blow to Vietnam’s agriculture and forestry and seafood sectors in the delta region last year. Official data show the growth rate in these sectors was only 1.36 per cent in 2016, the lowest since 2011. The drought also had major economic, social and environmental impacts as it severely affected Vietnam’s coffee, rice and shrimp production and exports.
There are many reasons why Vietnam is facing serious water scarcity. First is climate change. According to the World Bank, Vietnam is likely to be one of the five countries most affected by climate change. Last year’s El Nino-induced drought seriously reduced robusta coffee production in the central highlands and rice yields in the delta region. Vietnam is the world’s largest robusta producer and the third-largest rice exporter.
There is little Vietnam can do alone to reduce the frequency of El Nino-induced droughts. But it can take steps to make agricultural practices more water-efficient. It could consider changing cropping patterns, using a mix of crops, to improve management and technological practices, in order to reduce water requirements without curbing incomes.
As for the construction of hydropower dams by China, which many claim has been solely responsible for reduced water availability in the Mekong delta region, we must realise that demand for electricity and water in Mekong countries – China, Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam – is increasing steadily. And with more and more electricity needed for industrialisation, the six countries see the Mekong and its tributaries as major sources of energy.
The 132-metre-high Manwan Dam, the first built by China on the Mekong, began operating in 1995 and can generate up to 1,750 megawatts. Since then 11 hydropower dams have been built on the Mekong system, six of them in China, and more are in the pipeline to meet the demands of electricity-hungry Asia.
But will the push for hydropower cause more droughts in Vietnam?
To begin with, such dams do not actually consume any water. After electricity is generated, water is discharged into the river. Since the dams store the floodwaters during the rainy season and discharge them into the river system over the entire year, they should increase the water flowing in the rivers during dry seasons. This is to say, if dams are built only to generate electricity in the upper reaches of the Mekong and its tributaries in China, Laos and Thailand, they are unlikely to reduce the flow of water in the delta in the dry season.
However, institutional arrangements to manage the Mekong basin leave much to be desired. In 1957, the UN Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East set up a Committee for Coordination of Investigations of the Lower Mekong Basin as an autonomous body, popularly known as Mekong Committee, with four member states. Sixty years on ECAFE has become the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, and the Mekong Committee has transformed into the Mekong River Commission. China and Myanmar are not members of the MRC, which has spent hundreds of millions of dollars over the past six decades yet not undertaken even one single significant project on a regional scale. As a result, the Mekong’s full potential has not been realised in the riparian countries.
In other words, the effectiveness of the MRC and its predecessor has been disappointing.
Given these conditions, there is an urgent need to develop an effective institutional mechanism in which all riparian countries can jointly develop the Mekong region, in order to improve the lives and livelihoods of the people living there. But there are no signs of that happening in the foreseeable future. Rather, there appears to be a weakening of political will to cooperate, at least through the aegis of the MRC. So the riparian countries should urgently work on a coordinated and sustainable development plan for the Mekong region so as to realise the full potential of the river’s system.
Asit K Biswas is distinguished visiting professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore.
Cecilia Tortajada is a senior research fellow at Institute of Water Policy at the same school, and editor-in-chief of the International Journal of Water Resources Development.
Height Insoles: Hi, I do believe this is an excellent site. I stumbledupon …
http://fishinglovers.net: Appreciate you sharing, great post.Thanks Again. Keep writi…
Achilles Pain causes: Every weekend i used to pay a quick visit this site, as i w…
June 27, 2017
Regional plan for the Mekong has failed
by Nhan Quyen • [Human Rights]
By Asit K Biswas, Cecilia Tortajada, The Nation, June 27, 2017
Much has been written about the building of hydropower dams in the upper reaches of the Mekong River and their role in causing droughts in the Mekong delta region in Vietnam.
Many environmental and social activists claim Chinese dams have reduced the water flow in the delta, seriously harming rice cultivation and allowing saltwater to seep into soil.
Closer scrutiny of the facts reveals that drought dealt a serious blow to Vietnam’s agriculture and forestry and seafood sectors in the delta region last year. Official data show the growth rate in these sectors was only 1.36 per cent in 2016, the lowest since 2011. The drought also had major economic, social and environmental impacts as it severely affected Vietnam’s coffee, rice and shrimp production and exports.
There are many reasons why Vietnam is facing serious water scarcity. First is climate change. According to the World Bank, Vietnam is likely to be one of the five countries most affected by climate change. Last year’s El Nino-induced drought seriously reduced robusta coffee production in the central highlands and rice yields in the delta region. Vietnam is the world’s largest robusta producer and the third-largest rice exporter.
There is little Vietnam can do alone to reduce the frequency of El Nino-induced droughts. But it can take steps to make agricultural practices more water-efficient. It could consider changing cropping patterns, using a mix of crops, to improve management and technological practices, in order to reduce water requirements without curbing incomes.
As for the construction of hydropower dams by China, which many claim has been solely responsible for reduced water availability in the Mekong delta region, we must realise that demand for electricity and water in Mekong countries – China, Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam – is increasing steadily. And with more and more electricity needed for industrialisation, the six countries see the Mekong and its tributaries as major sources of energy.
The 132-metre-high Manwan Dam, the first built by China on the Mekong, began operating in 1995 and can generate up to 1,750 megawatts. Since then 11 hydropower dams have been built on the Mekong system, six of them in China, and more are in the pipeline to meet the demands of electricity-hungry Asia.
But will the push for hydropower cause more droughts in Vietnam?
To begin with, such dams do not actually consume any water. After electricity is generated, water is discharged into the river. Since the dams store the floodwaters during the rainy season and discharge them into the river system over the entire year, they should increase the water flowing in the rivers during dry seasons. This is to say, if dams are built only to generate electricity in the upper reaches of the Mekong and its tributaries in China, Laos and Thailand, they are unlikely to reduce the flow of water in the delta in the dry season.
However, institutional arrangements to manage the Mekong basin leave much to be desired. In 1957, the UN Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East set up a Committee for Coordination of Investigations of the Lower Mekong Basin as an autonomous body, popularly known as Mekong Committee, with four member states. Sixty years on ECAFE has become the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, and the Mekong Committee has transformed into the Mekong River Commission. China and Myanmar are not members of the MRC, which has spent hundreds of millions of dollars over the past six decades yet not undertaken even one single significant project on a regional scale. As a result, the Mekong’s full potential has not been realised in the riparian countries.
In other words, the effectiveness of the MRC and its predecessor has been disappointing.
Given these conditions, there is an urgent need to develop an effective institutional mechanism in which all riparian countries can jointly develop the Mekong region, in order to improve the lives and livelihoods of the people living there. But there are no signs of that happening in the foreseeable future. Rather, there appears to be a weakening of political will to cooperate, at least through the aegis of the MRC. So the riparian countries should urgently work on a coordinated and sustainable development plan for the Mekong region so as to realise the full potential of the river’s system.
Asit K Biswas is distinguished visiting professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore.
Cecilia Tortajada is a senior research fellow at Institute of Water Policy at the same school, and editor-in-chief of the International Journal of Water Resources Development.